Massachusetts is well-positioned as a candidate for iGaming, possessing the necessary revenue requirements, a structured gambling framework, and a sizable population. However, it struggles with the critical factor of speed to market.
During an iDevelopment and Economic Association webinar, Rep. David Muradian discussed the stalled progress of his initiatives towards iGaming, outlining how his efforts might be adapted as the state approaches 2027. Muradian introduced House Bill 4431 in 2025, but the Joint Committee on Economic Development and Emerging Technologies opted to postpone further review by sending the bill to study earlier this year.
The proposed legislation aimed to authorize iGaming through the Massachusetts Gaming Commission and would permit each of the state’s three licensed casinos to manage up to three online brands. Additionally, it established a 15% tax rate on gross online gaming revenue while banning sweepstakes casinos.
Despite Muradian's continued advocacy for iGaming in the next session, the situation in Massachusetts reflects a wider challenge faced by those supporting online gaming. The state seems to have a need for the associated tax revenue; however, lawmakers remain cautious, weighing the risks to the lottery, physical casinos, and consumer interests against the potential benefits. Muradian anticipates a slow progression on this issue, emphasizing the necessity for a methodical approach.
"Policy just takes time," he explained, highlighting that Massachusetts legislators introduce about 6,000 bills in a two-year cycle, with only 300 to 500 ultimately passing. "The legislative process is deliberate in its difficulty to pass a bill. We want public input, the committee process, and from there you create a good product."
Addressing fiscal implications, Muradian, a Republican, pointed to the state’s notorious “Taxachusetts” label, noting that the Massachusetts budget has surged from roughly $36 billion to $61 billion during his legislative career of 12 years. This growth, he said, reveals specific policy goals and mandates that demand public funding. He sees iGaming as a viable option to fill revenue gaps generated by these increasing needs.
According to Muradian, a regulated iGaming framework would not only provide additional tax revenue but also steer consumers away from unregulated or offshore gambling options, establishing more activities under a reputable state regulatory body. Estimates linked to his proposal forecast potential annual revenues reaching $200 million.
However, the expansion of iGaming must consider factors beyond revenue, particularly as it faces opposition from diverse interests, including anti-gambling factions. Wynn Resorts, operating Encore Boston Harbor, has voiced objections to iGaming, suggesting that online casino play could impact the retail revenue of existing establishments and decrease tax income from land-based gambling activities. Similarly, State Treasurer Deb Goldberg expressed concerns about competition with the Massachusetts Lottery as it endeavors to introduce online products.
Muradian defends iGaming as a means to regulate illicit activities already taking place through unregulated websites. He expects that any renewed legislative proposals will need to directly address concerns regarding market cannibalization.
Massachusetts already has a foundation of casino gaming and online sports betting, supported by one of the most proactive state regulators, the Massachusetts Gaming Commission, which would oversee any iGaming operations.
Moving forward, it appears that future iGaming discussions will concentrate less on the state’s technological or legal capacity to manage such activities. Instead, Muradian posited that the focus must be on demonstrating how iGaming can enhance, rather than undermine, current offerings, ensuring that consumer protection advocates have enforceable measures in place. This approach will also involve transparent communication with the public to clarify the advantages of a regulated market versus the existing offshore alternatives.
"[We need to] be forthcoming with the benefits of the industry, but some of the precautions that you can live with and scale back from," Muradian emphasized. "Tell both sides of the story."
