Home NewsRegulations & LicensesGermany Increases Online Slot Betting Limits 2023

Germany Increases Online Slot Betting Limits 2023

by Sienna Marques
0 views 5 minutes read
Germany Increases Online Slot Betting Limits 2023

Germany's gambling authority has responded to industry pressure by lifting the controversial €1 staking limit on online slot games. As of July, licensed operators of online slots can increase their stake limits to either €3 or €5 per spin, although the €1 limit remains as the baseline. Operators authorized by the Joint Gambling Authority of the Federal States (GGL) are now free to implement these revised limits, but only for qualifying players. To bet up to €3, players must be 21 years or older, while stakes of up to €5 are available only to players who have not displayed signs of problematic gambling in the past 90 days.

Operators have been mandated to monitor player behavior closely both before and after the new staking limits are enacted. Should troubling patterns arise, operators must take appropriate actions, which may include contacting players, limiting their gambling activities, or suspending their accounts.

The GGL indicated that the changes aim to reflect evolving market dynamics while adhering to the goals of Germany's State Treaty on Gambling (GlüStV). This includes maintaining a high level of player protection and preventing gambling addiction.

Some operators interpret this increase in stakes as an implicit acknowledgment that Germany's current online casino regulations have not successfully brought players into the legal marketplace.

"Positive signal"

Following sustained campaigns from the industry, German online operators have welcomed this initiative. Entain has characterized the change as a “positive signal” for Germany's licensed market.

Simon Priglinger-Simader, senior regulatory affairs manager at Entain Group and vice president of the German Online Casino Association (DOCV), stated, “The federal states are demonstrating their willingness to regularly review the practical impact of existing regulations and to make adjustments where necessary to achieve the objectives of the Interstate Treaty on Gambling.” He expressed hope that this decision would encourage more players to gravitate toward the regulated market.

The GGL retains the authority to raise staking limits based on market developments, but such decisions must be approved by representatives from all 16 federal states that comprise the authority's administrative board.

Priglinger-Simader noted that this move reflects a growing acknowledgment of the regulated industry’s challenges in contending with the black market. He said, “It’s clear that the states wouldn’t have made this change if they hadn’t seen the issue with channelisation and with the limited products we have been offering.”

Review of the Interstate Treaty

This decision comes as stakeholders anticipate a significant review of the Interstate Treaty, which is scheduled for completion by the end of the year. This review will mark the first examination of the legislation since it was enacted in 2021, aimed at evaluating whether the treaty has successfully guided players to the legal market while addressing problem gambling concerns.

The industry maintains that overbearing regulations, high taxes, and slow approval processes have hampered competitive capabilities against the black market, resulting in what the DOCV describes as an online channelisation rate in the mid-double-digits. This, they argue, is detrimental to player safety.

While major overhauls are not expected from the review, there are indications that lawmakers are taking steps to enhance the appeal of the legal market. Luka Andric, managing director of the German Sports Betting Association (DSWV), mentioned to iGB in March that the review has spurred in-depth discussions about the Interstate Treaty.

"What has changed is a growing awareness that the current framework is not fully achieving one of its central objectives: creating a sufficiently attractive legal market," Andric stated. He emphasized the need for competitive legal offerings to keep players within regulated environments and ensure effective protections.

Andric believes that concrete measures reminiscent of the new staking limits should emerge from the review process, stressing, “Rules that have proven ineffective – particularly in terms of channelisation – need to be revised or removed.”

Priglinger-Simader, however, cautions that the review may present a mixed outcome, as each of the 16 states assesses different elements of the law. He remarked, “Of course, there are states we will never hear anything positive from; that’s fact. But there are some topics where we have more positive expectations.”

Among these potential changes are online table games, which are currently banned, but might be revisited by a state more favorable to gambling. Additionally, the GGL may reconsider the five-second spin rule for online slots, which mandates an average spin speed of five seconds, allowing a combination of shorter and longer spins over time. Discussions are ongoing about permitting operators more flexibility in this area.

Deposit limits

There is also impending uncertainty regarding deposit limit amendments once current guidelines end this year. As things stand, player deposits are generally capped at €1,000 monthly, though select players may access higher limits of €10,000 or €30,000 after passing risk assessments. With two prior amendments failing to gain enough support, a third draft may seek a compromise to allow increased limits while implementing stricter checks on income and credit.

Priglinger-Simader identified a “worst-case scenario” as reverting to a blanket €1,000 cap.

For now, the regulated market celebrates this latest development. According to the DOCV, most operators have already begun raising their limits and implementing the necessary player monitoring systems to prioritize customer safety. Whether this change will signal a shift in regulatory approach or remain an isolated instance will depend on the outcome of the upcoming review.

Priglinger-Simader concluded that if Germany aims to effectively increase channelisation rates over the long term, “similar measures will also be needed in other areas.”

You may also like